Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Text-driven motion editing and intra-structural retargeting, where skeletons share topology but may differ in bone lengths and rest pose, are traditionally handled by fragmented pipelines with incompatible inputs and representations: editing relies on specialized generative steering, while retargeting is deferred to geometric post-processing. We present a unified conditional-flow framework that casts generation, semantic editing, and intra-structural retargeting as condition-modulated transport within one text- and skeleton-conditioned rectified-flow model. Under this formulation, editing changes the semantic condition while preserving skeletal structure, whereas retargeting changes the skeletal condition while preserving motion semantics. This makes FlowEdit-style transport a unified inference rule for motion manipulation rather than a task-specific editor. To instantiate this for articulated 3D motion, we develop a text- and skeleton-conditioned rectified-flow transformer. The model uses per-joint tokenization and explicit joint self-attention to capture spatial kinematic dependencies. We further inject text conditions at both joint and frame levels, while residual multi-condition classifier-free guidance balances text adherence and skeletal conformity. Experiments on SnapMoGen and a multi-character Mixamo subset show that one trained model supports text-to-motion generation, zero-shot editing, and zero-shot intra-structural retargeting without task-specific fine-tuning. This unified framework replaces separate pipelines with a single conditional motion transport model while keeping the same-topology retargeting scope explicit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: