Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The black hole zeroth law asserts the thermal equilibrium of a stationary Killing horizon, yet its status beyond general relativity remains limited. We demonstrate that its validity is not governed by a universal mechanism: distinct gravitational theories enforce constancy of the surface gravity through different horizon-projections of their field equations. In general relativity, $f(R)$-gravity, and Lovelock theories, the zeroth law is known to follow from the mixed (null-transverse) horizon equations. By contrast, we show that in non-Lovelock theories the zeroth law is enforced by qualitatively different mechanisms. In generalized quadratic gravity, for instance, the null-null component of the field equations dictates its validity. Exploiting this novel diagnostic, we obtain the first exact proof of the zeroth law in the broader landscape of higher-curvature gravity, without relying on a perturbative expansion around general relativity. Our result establishes the zeroth law as a sharp probe of the underlying thermodynamic structure of gravity, and points toward a classification of modified theories according to the mechanism responsible for its validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ghosh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: