Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Induction motor fault diagnosis is critical for reliable industrial systems. To tackle this challenge, this paper proposes a motor fault classification framework that combines multimodal fusion with supervised contrastive learning. The proposed approach consists of two key components. First, it converts vibration and acoustic signals into short-time Fourier transform spectrograms and performs image-level fusion to form a unified multimodal representation. Then, it applies a two-stage training pipeline: supervised contrastive pretraining of a convolutional encoder and a projection head, followed by a downstream classifier trained for fault classification. To validate the design, this paper conducts a systematic ablation study across four axes: sensor modality, signal representation, multimodal fusion strategy, and training strategy. More specifically, this paper evaluates two sensing modalities from three sensor channels (i.e., single-accelerometer, multiple-accelerometer, microphone-only), contrasts two representations (i.e., raw time-series, short-time Fourier transform spectrograms), assesses two accelerometer–microphone fusion strategies (i.e., feature-level fusion, image-level fusion), and compares two training strategies (i.e., supervised training, contrastive pretraining followed by supervised fine-tuning). Across these extensive evaluations on the UOEMD-VAFCVS benchmark dataset, the proposed approach achieves the best performance, demonstrating that time-frequency representation, multimodal image-level fusion, and contrastive representation learning jointly improve induction motor fault classification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: