Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: (SeSP) have emerged as potential neuroprotective agents. However, their therapeutic efficacy and underlying molecular mechanisms in the context of SCI have not been fully elucidated. METHODS: To address this, we utilized a clinically relevant rat model of T10 contusion SCI to evaluate the restorative effects of SeSP. We systematically assessed neurological function recovery and employed a combination of immunofluorescence, western blotting, and biochemical assays to investigate BSCB integrity, neuroinflammatory responses, oxidative stress markers, and ferroptosis regulatory networks within the injured spinal cord. RESULTS: SeSP administration significantly promoted locomotor recovery and preserved BSCB integrity by restoring the expression of key tight junction proteins (ZO-1, Occludin, and Claudin-5) and suppressing matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) activity. Furthermore, SeSP treatment attenuated neuronal loss, inhibited microglial activation, and reduced the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Mechanistically, SeSP mitigated lipid peroxidation and DNA damage while exerting a potent anti-ferroptotic effect, as evidenced by the upregulation of GPX4, FTH1, and SLC7A11, and the downregulation of TXNIP, ACSL1, and DMT1. CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that SeSP exerts robust neuroprotection in SCI primarily by maintaining BSCB integrity and inhibiting oxidative stress-driven neuronal ferroptosis. These data identify SeSP as a promising therapeutic candidate for mitigating secondary injury and enhancing functional recovery following spinal cord trauma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: