Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Caregiver-reported vocabulary screening is widely used in early childhood settings; yet its accuracy may be influenced by language background. Screening identifies children ‘at-risk’ of communication difficulties needing further assessment. This study compared child ‘risk’ status (<10th centile) and caregiver concern for monolingual and multilingual Australian English-speaking children (n = 1297, aged 10.0–36.9 months) via the OZI-Short Form (OZI-SF) – an authorised short-form MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory (MB-CDI) for Australia. Total concept scores were calculated, crediting items understood/produced in any language. Logistic regression analyses examined relationships between child risk status, caregiver concern and language background. Controlling for age, sex and socio-economic status, child risk status was not related to language background. ‘At-risk’ status based on OZI-SF score was associated with caregiver concern regardless of language background. These findings support the potential use of the OZI-SF to identify ‘at-risk’ performance for mono- and multilingual children and underscore alignment between caregiver concern and child risk status.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jones et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: