Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Meeting the stringent latency requirements of safety-critical vehicular services is a major challenge for beyond fifth generation (B5G) systems, and rapidly varying channel state information (CSI) in device-to-device (D2D) enabled vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communication makes the problem harder. This paper addresses power allocation in a D2D-enabled vehicular network in which vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) links reuse the spectrum of vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) links. The problem is formulated as a non-convex optimization problem that maximizes the V2I sum capacity subject to a V2V latency constraint. We use deep reinforcement learning to jointly select the V2I and V2V transmit powers from large-scale channel information, trained from measured outcomes rather than from the closed-form channel expressions used by the optimization-based solution, and a normalized preference weight that trades V2I capacity against V2V latency within a single network. The framework is implemented with a discrete-action deep Q-network (DQN) and with a continuous-action deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) agent. Under the nominal channel model, the DQN attains 85–95% and the DDPG agent 90–99% of the sum capacity of the model-based optimum, with a per-block computation time two to three orders of magnitude lower. When the reported large-scale channel gains contain errors of 2 dB, the model-based solution violates the V2V latency constraint on 46–56% of the links, whereas agents trained under such errors keep the violation rate below 0.5%. DDPG is preferable when the channel model is accurate, whereas the DQN trains more reliably under CSI errors. Queue-level simulations further show that, at the considered traffic loads, queueing rather than transmission failures dominates the delay tail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: