Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article compares the conceptual foundations of consumption, saving, and investment in conventional and Islamic economics and examines their implications for national income equilibrium. A qualitative, comparative literature-review approach is applied to classical macroeconomic theories, Islamic economic scholarship, and relevant Qur’anic principles. The analysis distinguishes the Keynesian current-income consumption function from life-cycle and permanent-income approaches, then examines saving–investment coordination, aggregate demand, and multiplier effects. It contrasts these mechanisms with Islamic principles of lawful and moderate consumption, socially responsible wealth management, prohibition of riba, and financing linked to productive assets and risk sharing. The findings indicate that the accounting identity of national income and the analytical logic of planned saving–investment equilibrium remain useful in both frameworks; however, Islamic economics introduces additional normative criteria for the allocation and circulation of resources. Zakat and other transfers may affect the distribution of disposable income and aggregate consumption, while Sharia-compliant financial intermediation may channel savings toward real-sector activity, subject to institutional quality and investment conditions. The article proposes an integrative analytical framework separating macroeconomic identities, behavioral assumptions, and ethical objectives. These are theoretical implications rather than estimates of causal effects. The study contributes a structured comparison relevant to Islamic macroeconomic education and the design of inclusive financial policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: