Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Delayed wound closure after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures is an important soft tissue consideration. This study evaluated its incidence and associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed at 2 level 1 trauma centers including adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent ORIF for diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures (AO/OTA (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen / Orthopaedic Trauma Association) 2R2, 2U2) from 2010 to 2025. Delayed wound closure was defined as unplanned return to the operating room for definitive closure or soft-tissue coverage. Demographic, injury, and perioperative variables were analyzed. Multivariable Firth-penalized logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors. RESULTS: Among 292 patients (mean age, 41.6 years; 56.8% male), delayed wound closure occurred in 14 (4.8%). All patients requiring delayed closure were male (100% vs 54.7%) and more frequently had Gustilo-Anderson type III open fractures (42.9% vs 3.3%), nerve injury (21.4% vs 3.7%), and vascular injury (14.3% vs 0%). Operative time was longer in patients requiring delayed closure (median, 176 vs 127 minutes). On multivariable analysis, prolonged operative time was independently associated with delayed closure (adjusted odds ratio, 7.7; 95% CI, 1.8-71.7). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed wound closure after ORIF of both-bone forearm fractures occurred in fewer than 5% of patients and was independently associated with longer operative time, suggesting that delayed closure is associated with more complex operative courses and evolving soft-tissue considerations. Surgeons should counsel patients on the potential need for staged wound management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Polisetty et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: