Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We present the formulation and implementation of an unrestricted/open-shell domain-based local pair natural orbital equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method with single and double excitations for vertical ionization potentials (UHF IP-EOM-DLPNO-CCSD). The method extends the open-shell DLPNO–CCSD reference calculation to the (N – 1)-electron sector by reusing the localized occupied orbitals, pair domains, pair lists, and pair natural orbital spaces generated for the correlated ground state. Removal of an α or β electron is treated in separate spin sectors. The one-hole sector is retained in the fully localized occupied space, whereas the two-hole–one-particle sector is represented in compact, spin-resolved PNO spaces. The accuracy is controlled by the standard LoosePNO, NormalPNO, and TightPNO hierarchy. For ionized states dominated by one-hole character, canonical and local calculations performed with the same quasi-restricted-orbital (QRO) reference give typical RMSD differences of a few hundredths of an eV for the main-group radical and transition-metal benchmark sets. A representative TightPNO comparison for naphthalene further indicates that the additional local IP-EOM approximation contributes less than 0.10 eV for the ten matched states examined. Larger delocalized systems show less regular threshold dependence, and even predominantly one-hole states can exhibit changes greater than 0.1 eV between NormalPNO and TightPNO. Timing calculations for anionic acenes up to heptacene, with 1038 basis functions, show low-order effective scaling for the IP-EOM step. Applications to C70– and to the Pheophytin radical anion, the latter containing 3020 basis functions, demonstrate that the method can treat large open-shell molecular systems beyond the size range routinely accessible to canonical IP-EOM-CCSD. Finally, comparisons with available experimental data for the N-carbazolyl radical and the ovalene radical cation provide additional context for the calculated vertical ionization energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Casanova‐Páez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: