Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Living intangible cultural heritage (ICH) challenges integrated STEAM education because curricular coherence does not itself establish permission for cultural representation. We retrospectively audited a three-round Delphi archive relevant to Chinese higher education (18 coded experts; 44, 53 and 52 rated prompts; 2682 ratings) and separately synthesised a prospective Culture–Technology–Ethics (CTE) lens. The recalculated mean item ratings were 3.9533, 4.6646 and 4.6603 across the rounds; 43 of 52 final-round means exceeded 4.50. The 49 Round-2/Round-3 content links include 35 lexical matches and 14 reworded propositions, limiting longitudinal comparison; 41 of 72 Round-2 priority answers exceeded their selection caps and cannot support compliant rankings. The CTE synthesis differentiates cultural decision standing (C), pedagogical purpose (T) and accountable stewardship (E), proposing a use-specific review before the consequential circulation of educational artefacts. This is a bounded authorial proposition supported by heritage-governance literature, not a Delphi-validated measurement model, demonstrated cultural permission or evidence of educational and sustainability effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanhu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: