Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: While planning for the post-treatment rehabilitation of edentulous dental arches, most of the information is derived from anatomical landmarks of the face. If no pre-extraction records are available, it becomes difficult to plan for rehabilitation of such cases. Aim: To evaluate whether the intercanthal and intercanine distances can be used as a reliable guide to determine proportions of maxillary anterior teeth during the prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous dental arches. Materials and Methods: This observational study included 500 subjects aged between 18-52 years. The mesiodistal width of maxillary central incisors and intercanthal and intercanine distances were measured for all study subjects; their correlation was assessed using Karl Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) test. Results: The findings of the present study showed a positive and statistically significant correlation between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary left central incisor and the intercanthal distance among the study subjects (r-value=0.093, p-value=0.037). No significant correlation was observed among the studied parameters in terms of gender among the included subjects. Conclusion: In the absence of pre-extraction records of the patients, the ratio between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary left central incisor and the intercanthal distance may be considered as a plausible source of information by the clinicians to determine the proportions of maxillary anterior teeth during the prosthetic rehabilitation of edentulous dental arches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vijayakumar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: