Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bevacizumab is an important component of first-line therapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer; however, the precise identification of patients who will benefit and how to optimize its use in the era of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) remains a core challenge in clinical practice. This review systematically revisits the pivotal phase III trials GOG-0218 and ICON7, together with their inherent limitations, with a particular focus on the role of KELIM score as a dynamic marker of chemotherapy sensitivity in predicting bevacizumab efficacy. Based on the interaction test from GOG-0218, the available evidence suggests that BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status does not alter the single-agent activity of bevacizumab; however, these genetic markers remain crucial for guiding PARPi or combination regimens. A key clinical dilemma arises when patients with a BRCA mutation have already received bevacizumab during first-line chemotherapy: should bevacizumab be continued or discontinued during the maintenance phase? This review presents a preference analysis and individualized decision-making factors based on available indirect evidence and current guidelines. Finally, a clinical decision pathway that integrates KELIM assessment with HRD testing is proposed to provide an evidence-based reference framework for the rational use of bevacizumab in first-line advanced ovarian cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: