Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Whether bone metastasis is present at diagnosis determines curative versus systemic treatment of prostate cancer, yet referral for advanced staging relies on imperfect risk stratification; magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics has been proposed to predict metastatic status from routinely acquired staging imaging. Methods: This systematic review (PROSPERO CRD420261463568) searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies of radiomic, deep-learning or hybrid models predicting bone-metastatic status from prostate MRI; incremental value over clinical predictors, reporting completeness, radiomics methodology and risk of bias were appraised. Results: Six retrospective studies (1240 patients, 491 with bone metastasis, all from China; 322 contributed to the principal validation estimates) were included. Clinical-plus-radiomics models achieved validation areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.893–0.920 internally and 0.903 externally, with the highest estimate (0.928) from a multimodal model lacking clinical predictors. Only two studies compared clinical-only with combined models (AUC increments of 0.060 and 0.081). Conclusions: Reported discrimination was generally high, but current evidence cannot establish that radiomics adds value beyond routine clinical predictors. These models are best understood as predictive biomarkers rather than detection tools; a potential triage role among patients below routine staging thresholds remains untested, and transportability beyond the high-prevalence cohorts studied is unproven; prospective multicentre validation is required before clinical use.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clausen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: