Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A novel complementarity-based screening framework is developed for vibration- and shock-induced disengagement of a spring-loaded self-locking pawl latch used for remote handling of a portable railway wheel chock. The engagement geometry is treated explicitly. The critical opening angle is derived from the engagement depth and the engagement radius, and a retention factor κ carries the wear, tolerance and elastic-approach allowances. Contact forces and moments are formulated for the locked and the incipient-opening configurations, and the equivalent-wedge self-locking condition is recovered only as their plane-flank limit. Because the catch element is a cylindrical pin, the retention condition within the planar rigid-contact model is tan ψ ≤ μ , in which ψ is the same angle that fixes the critical opening angle; the wedge form understates the required friction coefficient by a factor of approximately 2.4 for the stated worked-example dimensionless proportions ( α = 5° and δ / a = 0.208). The latch is then treated as a unilateral-contact system governed by five dimensionless groups: the frequency ratio, the damping ratio, the severity number Λ , the pulse duration Θ , and a preload number Π = M 0 /( k φ φ c r ) introduced here. Three cases are separated. For the seated latch the criterion is loss of contact, Λ < Π . The preload-free oscillator is retained as an explicitly labelled upper-bound idealisation. The seated latch with a lift-off threshold is formulated as a linear complementarity problem. Numerical integration of that model over 0.1 ≤ Π ≤ 40 supports the conservative algebraic screening bound Λ < 0.6( Π + κ ). The damping ratio moves this boundary by less than 4 %, and the worst frequency ratio is sub-resonant, so the critical damping ratio of the preload-free model does not describe the preloaded latch. Reproducible Euler-Bernoulli and Rayleigh calculations for an explicitly defined reduced shaft model place the first bending frequency between 3.2 and 62.0 Hz, which identifies the grip-to-pivot amplification, rather than the damping ratio, as the measurement of highest value. For the nominal set of the worked example the model predicts a lift-off acceleration of 1389 m/s 2 ; at the worst corner of the parameter domain it predicts 167 m/s 2 , and a conditional guard-banded screening calculation at β = 1 excludes that corner under the assumed input uncertainties. All quantities are model predictions conditional on assumed parameters; no experimental validation is claimed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Talipov et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: