Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This study aims to explain how family-based coordination resources support post-crisis change by distinguishing organizational resilience from post-crisis reinvention. It tests whether family embeddedness, family labour reliance and informal family governance predict later resilience and whether digitalization strengthens the resilience−reinvention relationship in Saudi micro and small family enterprises. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave survey with an exact 70-day individual lag produced an analytic sample of 318 firms. Time 1 measured family resources, digitalization, COVID shock severity and baseline outcomes; Time 2 measured resilience and reinvention. Primary models in Mplus 8.10 used MLR, FIML and autoregressive controls. Indirect-effect intervals came from a separate 5,000-replication ML bootstrap, and the latent resilience x digitalization interaction was estimated separately under TYPE = RANDOM. Findings All three family resources were positively associated with Time 2 resilience, but their direct paths to reinvention were small and nonsignificant. Their indirect associations through resilience were significant. Resilience and digitalization were positively associated with reinvention, and the resilience−reinvention relationship strengthened as digitalization increased. Because resilience and reinvention were contemporaneous at Time 2, the conditional indirect pattern is interpreted associationally. Originality/value This study develops a staged conditional-process explanation: family resources supply coordination capacity for continuity, while digitalization strengthens the conversion of preserved capacity into renewal. The Saudi setting makes this mechanism theoretically salient because kin-based coordination and informal governance coexist with institutional modernization and rapid SME digitalization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Najah et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: