Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The physical properties of amaranth and corn were evaluatedusing Student’s t-test for moisture content, thousand-grainweight, test weight, absolute density, and flotation index.Significant differences (p < 0.05) were observed between thetwo grains. Water absorption profiles at room temperaturewere analyzed by ANCOVA, revealing a higher absorptionrate in amaranth (0.0023 g water/min) than in corn (0.0016g water/min). This study compared amaranth and cornusing two alternative nixtamalization processes: (1) Ca(OH)₂nanoparticles, and (2) a Solid-Lime-Particle-free solution(SLPF). The traditional method was used for comparison.Proximate analysis showed that SLPF-treated amaranth hada higher ash content (3.58 %) than traditionally nixtamalizedamaranth (3.33 %), while the nanoparticle treatment resultedin a higher calcium concentration (6,262 mg/kg) comparedto traditional amaranth nixtamalization (4,163 mg/kg). Thenejayote (steeping liquor) from the traditional nixtamalizationof both grains generated the highest pollution load. TheSLPF method applied to corn reduced the pH to 8.65 andalkalinity to 881.67 mg/L CaCO₃. The use of nanoparticlesduring nixtamalization contributes to increasing calciumcontent, whereas the SLPF method offers an alternative forminimizing effluent pollution during grain processing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Balderas‐López et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: