Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Advancements in active learning methods necessitate transparent and continuous dialogue between learners and educators to align and reconcile differing expectations. This study investigates the co-creation of assessment marking criteria in higher education, emphasising the pedagogical value of involving learners in collaboratively designing rubrics with teachers. The research explores how co-creation fosters student engagement, critical thinking, and shared ownership of valuable active learning opportunities. Conducted following a postgraduate module, the study analysed learners’ experiences of co-creating a marking rubric and employed a qualitative methodology involving module evaluations, focus groups, and interviews with participating learners. Four key themes emerged from the data on student perceptions of co-creating a marking rubric in that they: provided novel learning experiences, enhanced agency and creativity, strengthened the sense of community, and improved clarity of assessment expectations for authentic assessment. Benefits and challenges in rubric co-design and implementation are discussed within each of these themes. Findings reveal that 82% of participating learners reported a greater understanding of assessment criteria, with several describing the co-creation process as transformative and one likening the experience to ‘entering a forbidden territory’. The collaborative development of the rubric promoted inclusivity, deepened assessment literacy, and enhanced learners’ confidence and motivation. Findings also suggest that the experience of co-creating the marking rubric may have contributed to higher student achievement in the associated summative assessment task. The research demonstrates that co-creating assessment rubrics can not only enhance academic performance but also build a more inclusive, student-centred educational environment. These findings support broader implementation of co-creation practices as a means to enrich active learning and foster collaborative academic communities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lubicz-Nawrocka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: