Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mapping apparent visible-waterline change from bi-temporal optical imagery requires distinguishing narrow boundary responses from sea-surface texture, radiometric variation, and residual registration error. This study presents a direct binary mapping network that combines frequency-aware feature decoupling with deep semantic guidance. At four encoder scales, fixed 3×3 average pooling separates a locally smooth component from the element-wise absolute temporal feature difference; subtraction yields a complementary residual. Mamba processes the smooth component, spatial attention reweights the residual, and deep semantic features guide decoder skips. The target is the pixel-wise exclusive OR of two independently annotated, finite-width visible-waterline masks. The dataset contains 174 pairs of 512×512-pixel patches with nominal 2 m pixel spacing. Patches do not overlap within each source-image pair, while the manually constructed training, validation, and test subsets can share source scenes. On the reported 122/17/35 partition, the method achieved 91.45% Precision, 89.62% Recall, 90.53% pixel F1, and 93.35% boundary F1 at a 2-pixel tolerance. The reported pixel F1 was 2.68 percentage points higher than ChangeMamba. These are descriptive within-scene comparisons: 33 of the 35 test pairs have an empty shoreline mask at one date, and the references predominantly contain straight or piecewise-linear geometry. The scores consequently characterize the specified annotation-based target rather than geographically independent generalization or physical shoreline displacement. No tidal-datum correction was applied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: