Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Conventional two-dimensional (2D) pathology samples less than 0.1% of colorectal polyp tissue and may miss clinically relevant histologic features. Here, we compared three-dimensional (3D) volumetric pathology with standard 2D evaluation to determine whether expanded sampling identifies additional high-risk features and alters endoscopic surveillance recommendations. Methods In this prospective single-center study, 158 colorectal polyps from 100 patients (143 adenomas ≥ 6 mm and 15 hyperplastic polyps with endoscopically discordant impressions) underwent three independent evaluations – the original 2D pathology report, an independent 2D digital review by three blinded pathologists, and 3D volumetric fluorescence imaging on 150-µm sections. Surveillance intervals followed United States Multi-Society Task Force 2020 guidelines. Interobserver agreement was assessed by Fleiss’ κ, whereas surveillance reclassification was tested with the McNemar exact test. Results 3D pathology identified histologic discrepancies in 35.0% of adenomas (50/143), with 34.8% (40/115) of tubular adenomas reclassified as tubulovillous adenomas and 5.8% (8/139) of low-grade dysplasia cases upgraded to high-grade dysplasia. Among the 15 endoscopically discordant hyperplastic polyps, 6 (40.0%) were reclassified as adenomatous lesions. Overall, 32 of 100 patients (32%) were reassigned to higher-risk surveillance categories – with the high-risk group rising from 25 to 56 (paired odds ratio = 32.0; P < .001). Fleiss’ κ was 0.696 for 2D and 0.726 for 3D analysis. Conclusions 3D volumetric pathology detected villous architecture and high-grade dysplasia overlooked on standard 2D sections, reclassifying one-third of patients into higher-risk surveillance groups. Prospective studies are warranted to determine whether 3D-based risk stratification may reduce post-colonoscopy colorectal cancer. Trial registration Taipei Medical University Hospital Joint Institutional Review Board, reference N202310020. Issued on 14 December 2023.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: