Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Surface defects on hot-rolled steel strips are often low in contrast, resemble the background, and co-occur. This paper presents DFE-Net, a refinement of YOLO11n for steel surface defect detection. A defect-aware dual-stream gated cross-modulation module (DA-GCM), derived from the FCM block, lets a semantic stream and an appearance stream modulate each other through a dual-pooling channel attention and a multiscale strip spatial attention and combines them with a pixel-wise gate. A spatial-frequency detail-compensation pyramid (SFDP) injects space-to-depth P2 features into the P3 fusion node, refines them with an FFT-based large-kernel block, and aggregates the inputs of every node with an adopted Global Modulated Fusion (GMF) module. A shared-stem parameter-efficient detection head (SSP-Head) shares a grouped-convolution stem between regression and classification. On NEU-DET, over five paired seeds, DFE-Net reaches 74.27 ± 0.81% mAP@0.5 and 41.83 ± 0.55% mAP@0.5:0.95 with 2.24 M parameters, 0.91 and 0.58 points above YOLO11n; the 95% confidence intervals include zero, although mAP@0.5:0.95 is higher in all five seeds and in all five folds of a cross-validation, a consistent direction that tests corrected for the overlap of the cross-validation training sets do not confirm. DFE-Net is significantly more accurate than YOLOv8n and YOLO26n but on par with YOLOv9t. It has 13.2% fewer parameters than YOLO11n, but its computation rises from 6.3 to 7.4 GFLOPs and its batch-1 latency from 5.63 to 14.31 ms on a desktop GPU and from 10.15 to 28.73 ms on a Jetson Orin Nano. DFE-Net is thus a compact detector with a modest accuracy gain; its robustness and suitability for online inspection require further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: