Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Children with suspected autism spectrum disorder (ASD) currently experience significant delays before receiving a developmental evaluation, which in turn delays initiation of services. We aimed to implement and evaluate a novel telemedicine model for diagnosing ASD in children under 3 years at 2 primary care sites. METHODS: Children under 3 years with a concern for ASD were referred to the program by their primary care providers. Families completed an adaptive behavior scale and a structured telemedicine observation administered by a trained program coordinator. A psychologist reviewed all materials and made a diagnosis of ASD if appropriate. Indeterminate cases were scheduled for in-person assessment. Results were sent to primary care providers, who gave feedback to families. Families were asked to complete a survey after evaluation. RESULTS: Between October 2022 and March 2024, 189 patients were evaluated and 146 diagnosed with ASD by telemedicine, whereas 38 required in-person assessment. The median time to evaluation was 32 days, and there was 99% diagnostic concordance among patients seen by a specialist. There were no disparities in time to evaluation by language, race, ethnicity, or insurance type. Overall, parents and providers gave positive feedback about the model, although almost two-thirds of parents expressed a preference for in-person assessment. CONCLUSION: In this primary care-based telemedicine autism diagnosis program patients under age 3 years were diagnosed quickly and accurately with ASD. However, families still expressed a preference for in-person evaluation. Future work should focus on how to improve acceptability while maintaining efficiency, and the impact of the program on the timing of service connectivity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rea et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: