Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Z-drugs are alternatives to benzodiazepines (BZDs) for insomnia, but overdose safety remains uncertain. We compared acute and post-discharge outcomes after intentional Z-drug and BZD overdose. Methods This retrospective cohort included 239 adults (110 Z-drug; 129 BZD) treated at two emergency departments without flumazenil (2018–2024). Models adjusted for age, sex, dose category, intent, and center. Results Compared with BZD overdose, Z-drug overdose was associated with more recorded physical restraint use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 6.974; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.358–14.483), more recorded patient-behavior-related medical interruption events (PB-MIEs; aOR, 5.955; 95% CI, 2.732–12.980), and a longer emergency-department stay (adjusted median difference, 2.516 h; 95% CI, 2.056–2.845), but fewer intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (aOR, 0.092; 95% CI, 0.031–0.272). Among admitted patients, total stay was longer after Z-drug overdose (228 vs 146 h, P < 0.001). The hazard of a first documented anxiety and/or depressive diagnosis was higher after Z-drug overdose (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.918; 95% CI, 1.928–4.416). Recurrence proportions were similar (25.5% vs 23.3%; log-rank P = 0.426), but timing differed. The recurrence Cox model violated the proportional-hazards assumption; the adjusted HR of 1.266 is descriptive, not a constant relative risk. Among 58 recurrent cases, standard single-dose (SSD) multiples declined and documented intent shifted toward sleep-related dose escalation; this pattern may partly reflect assessment or documentation differences. Conclusion Z-drug overdose was associated with more recorded behavioral-management events and a higher hazard of first documented psychiatric diagnosis, whereas BZD overdose was associated with more severe supportive-care outcomes. Initial care should integrate mental-status and respiratory monitoring with behavioral and self-harm assessment. Follow-up should address insomnia, medication safety, and mental health. Recurrence timing and intent shifts were documented associations, not causal effects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: