Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three puzzles in galaxy evolution follow from the energy cascade in haloes and galaxy centres: the steep decline of cosmic star formation since z2, the excess of UV-bright galaxies at $z>10$, and over-massive early black holes. Haloes of fixed mass collapse at a fixed density contrast until a crossover at a_*0.5--0.64, then grow denser. Gas instead radiates its random energy; if it keeps a fixed contrast, the cascade rate shared by all galaxy cores rises as (1+z)5/2. Like haloes, galaxies have two levels: cores share a rate and boundaries a contrast, so the rate at the effective radius lies below the core rate by F∝ M-2/3, about 1 in spheroids and ~10² in low-mass discs. (i) Late decline. Infalling gas reaches the galaxy only if the core radiates its heat fast enough. After a_* this cooling fraction falls as (1+z)5/4, steepening the local slope of the star-formation density from 1.5 to 2.7 with no added parameter. (ii) First galaxies. Core densities at a given scale are the same in every host, so the threshold for feedback-free star formation is crossed in all haloes at once. A sharp onset at z10.5 fits the JWST densities and luminosity functions better than bursty or feedback-free alternatives (Δ AIC≥42). (iii) Black holes. Luminosity is limited by the pressure of the dense core gas, which rises with redshift, rather than by electron scattering. The resulting ceiling, L/LEdd∝(1+z)²MBH-1/5, encloses all but 24 of 1.5×10⁵ quasars{ and the little red dots with revised masses}{}. Because the core sets the black hole, MBH/σ⁵ stays constant, while dynamical masses at the effective radius of disc-dominated hosts lie a factor F70--90 below the core level, nearly cancelling the rise of the core rate, (1+z)5/288 at z5. This is why JADES black holes lie 1--2 dex above the local relation with stellar mass but near those with dispersion and dynamical mass. Against local disc hosts measured alike, the JADES hosts lie higher in σ³/Rₑ by $+1.18$ dex at fixed σ and $+1.98$ dex at fixed dynamical mass, as predicted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhijie Xu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: