Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Network intrusion detection must adapt to changing traffic while preserving recognition of previously observed attacks. This paper studies the trade-off between retraining frequency, labelled sample size, and detection performance, and designs an evidence-guided security operations centre (SOC) workflow around the detector. A 100-tree Random Forest is evaluated on six constructed traffic windows with increasing proportions of DDoS and PortScan attacks. Across five paired random seeds, an output-based adaptive policy achieves 92.008% pooled incoming attack recall, compared with 92.302% for retraining every two windows, while reducing mean retraining counts from 3.0 to 1.8. No drift alarms occur in the tested stable controls. However, exact-feature grouped evaluation exposes a concentrated retention failure: one seed loses detection of 883 previously recognised old attack rows after an update. A separate validation-gate experiment accepts every candidate and therefore does not establish a protective benefit. A small FTP capture further shows that successful feature conversion does not guarantee attack recognition: all 30 flows are classified benign despite evidence of repeated failed logins. The proposed architecture connects detection with packet investigation, indicator extraction, timelines, evidence-grounded analysis, ATT&CK mapping, and analyst-approved response. Results support a limited offline cost–recall trade-off, while identifying retention, labelling realism, and extractor compatibility as unresolved requirements.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saquib Azam Khan, Shahid Farooq Malik, Shaikh Aslam Sami, Dr. Jagadishwari V (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: