Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Air mobility has emerged as a key paradigm for enabling flexible and efficient aerial transportation and mission-oriented operations. Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), commonly referred to as drones, and particularly platforms with vertical takeoff and landing (VTOL) capabilities, play a central role in the development of future air mobility systems. In this paper, a new conceptual framework linking six key dimensions: VTOL/eVTOL architectures, regulatory constraints, flight mission profiles, air mobility algorithms, infrastructure requirements, and social impacts, was proposed. The first four layers from the proposed framework that are usually surveyed separately, VTOL airframe architectures, mission profiles for single and multiple vehicles, the algorithms that turn a mission into executable flight, and the regulatory frameworks within which all of this must operate, were integrated and analyzed. Planning methods are classified by decision level, information availability, coordination structure, computational approach, and assurance level, with algorithmic guarantees interpreted in the context of their underlying assumptions. An illustrative phase-dependent energy model explores how hover fraction and cruise range influence comparisons among multirotor, lift-plus-cruise, and tilt-rotor configurations. To improve cross-study interpretation, the review also proposes task-dependent reporting domains and an evidence-level framework for assessing algorithmic results. The synthesis provides guidance for coupled platform and planning-method selection, while recognizing the limitations of its source-selection process and comparisons across heterogeneous evaluation conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Udroiu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: