Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: To assess which measure of neuropathy best detects the progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) in type 1 diabetes (T1DM). Methods: Patients with T1DM (n = 56) underwent assessment of the neuropathy symptom profile (NSP), neuropathy disability score (NDS), warm perception threshold (WPT), nerve conduction studies [peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (PMNCV) and amplitude (PMNA); sural sensory NCV (SSNCV) and amplitude (SSNA)], intraepidermal nerve fiber density (IENFD; only eight follow-up biopsy paired results were available), and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) [corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD); branch density (CNBD); and length (CNFL)] at baseline and after a mean of 5.77 ± 1.71 years. Results: Despite a significant improvement in HbA1c (p = 0.0005) and LDL (p = 0.018) there was a reduction in CNFD (p = 0.036), CNBD (p = 0.0006), CNFL (p = 0.007), IENFD (p = 0.047) and SSNCV (p = 0.001), but no change in NSP, NDS, WPT, PMNCV, PMNA, and SSNA. Conclusions: Corneal nerve fiber degeneration is more consistently detected over time in patients with T1DM than changes in symptoms, signs, thermal thresholds, or nerve conduction studies, supporting its utility as a sensitive marker to evaluate DPN progression and therapeutic efficacy in clinical trials of DPN.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petropoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: