Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Nurse practitioners (NPs) improve health care access and provide high-quality care, yet 11 U.S. states continue to require physician supervision. Little is known about how statutory supervision functions in routine practice. Purpose: To describe NPs' experiences with physician supervision in North Carolina and examine associations between supervisory relationship characteristics and perceived benefit of supervision. Methodology: A descriptive, correlational survey was conducted among NPs practicing in NC. A researcher-developed electronic survey assessed demographics, supervisory characteristics, and perceptions of physician supervision. Descriptive statistics summarized responses, and chi-square analyses examined associations between supervisory characteristics and perceived supervision benefit. Results: A total of 1,486 NPs participated. Supervisory relationships varied considerably. Nearly half (44.6%) rarely or never practiced at the same site as their supervising physician, 64.9% never participated in shared patient visits, and 45.2% reported no physician review of plans of care or clinical documentation. Overall, 59.8% disagreed that having a supervising physician was beneficial to practicing effectively. Greater clinical interaction, including shared practice location, real-time consultation, physician review of plans of care, shared patient visits, and shared patient panels, was significantly associated with greater perceived benefit of supervision (all p < .001). More experienced NPs were less likely to perceive supervision as beneficial. Conclusions: Statutory physician supervision often occurs with limited direct clinical interaction. Perceived value appears associated with meaningful clinical collaboration rather than supervisory requirements. Implications: These findings provide empirical evidence to inform policy discussions and suggest models emphasizing collaboration rather than mandatory supervisory agreements may better reflect contemporary NP practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perry et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: