Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reliable thermal-to-visible localization requires verifying whether geometrically consistent matches identify the correct map region. We present Provenance-Isolated Verification of Observation Transport (PIVOT), a predictive verifier that selects among direct, temporally transported, and fused correspondence sources. All occurrences of each persistent map-point identity are assigned to the same fold. Candidate poses are fitted on complementary folds and assessed on held-out observations using a marginalized inlier–outlier likelihood, followed by an all-observation refit of the selected source. On 898 aerial Multi-View Thermal–Visible (MTV) queries, PIVOT achieves 67.82% success at 0.02d/5°, improving direct localization by 5.68 percentage points and unconditional fusion by 3.90 points. It also exceeds the tested transport-aware bundle-adjustment control using the same transported map points. On 300 disjoint Vision for Visibility Dataset (ViViD++) queries, the predeclared PIVOT-Seq obtains 63 successes at 10 m/5°, compared with 61 for direct localization and 62 for fusion. The exploratory core analysis also obtains 63 primary successes, numerically exceeding fusion. The MTV improvement is obtained through per-frame source selection without temporal decoding or scene-specific selector training. The in-sample MTV selector reaches 628 primary successes, so cross-fitting protects against identity reuse rather than maximizing the measured accuracy. The demonstrated gains and the small exploratory external advantage warrant further independent aerial and sensor validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: