Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Transient methane pyrolysis in a DC thermal plasma reactor was assessed using a zero-dimensional control-volume reconstruction and elemental balance consistency framework. Programmed Ar and CNG feed rates, time-aligned outlet gas readings, a conditional Ar cross-sensitivity correction for the H2 detector, and finite gas holdup were combined with C/H/O residuals, a lumped thermal state, and exploratory kinetic and exergy scenarios. For the principal 10–25 min interval, the nominal conditional CH4 conversion is 94.2%; the 93.2–95.1% Monte Carlo interval propagates selected nominal analyzer specifications only and is not an experimental confidence interval because the raw H2 readings (approximately 51–59 vol.%; the corrected mean is 59.2 vol.%) exceeded the listed 0–10 vol.% range. Deterministic ±20% H2-channel gain scenarios give 91.95–95.46% conversion but are not calibration-error bounds. A hypothetical air-ingress scenario that closes the mean oxygen balance yields 93.84% conversion with a remaining hydrogen residual of 13.35 mol-H min−1; C2Hγ scenarios do not simultaneously reconcile the hydrogen balance and reported recovered carbonaceous mass. The dynamic and quasi-steady outlet-flow reconstructions nearly coincide (mean ratio: 1.0001; effective gas residence time: ≈0.25 s versus an estimated 1000 s lumped thermal scale). The 4–34 min integrated carbon-equivalent residual is 2.31 kg-C, compared with 1.875 kg of reported recovered carbonaceous material of unverified purity and run attribution. Measured H2 is approximately 49% of the ideal CH4-to-C(s)-plus-2H2 yield, with no unique explanation for the hydrogen deficit. The oxygen residual (−0.143 mol-O/min) is approximately 11.4 times the oxygen input from the stated CNG feed and is therefore not a satisfactory oxygen closure. Reduced kinetic and exergy calculations remain exploratory, assumption-dependent diagnostics, not independently validated performance predictions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Segantine et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: