Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Gold volatility responds to shocks and sentiment, yet the two are rarely fused, and forecasts seldom become actionable. We link a multi-source fusion subsystem to a risk-warning layer through a Transformer whose three pre-registered hyperparameters are searched by particle swarm optimization (PSO-Transformer). It fuses video sentiment, headline scoring and market factors screened to 20 of 21 candidates; the decision side maps the predicted realized variance RVt/Mt (bp2, non-annualized) into three traffic-light tiers of a calibrated predictive distribution. On 5-min spot gold data (January–June 2025, 126 trading days), the PSO-Transformer attains a one-step MAE of 8.038, a 36.5% average improvement over seven baselines under protocol P1, where selection and evaluation share one window; under the leak-free protocol P2, the same pipeline attains 10.16 against 8.82 for the GRU, so the first place reflects the P1 design, not an independent out-of-sample comparison. Diebold–Mariano gains over GARCH, SVM and XGBoost survive a Holm correction. Walk-forward backtesting over 59 origins with persistence-anchored alerts yields 67.8% tier accuracy, 78.8% high-risk precision and 92.9% recall, with the neural engine fed into the same rule attaining 45.5% against 61.4%. One instrument, six months: a documented architecture, not a demonstrated transfer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: