Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective This study aimed to examine the mediating role of patient-perceived doctor–patient communication quality in the association between claustrophobia and doctor–patient trust in the context of diagnostic imaging examinations, and to further identify latent profiles of patients’ claustrophobic experiences from a person-centered perspective. Methods A cross-sectional design was adopted. Patients undergoing diagnostic imaging examinations (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] and computed tomography [CT]) at two tertiary Grade-A hospitals in Sichuan Province, China, completed a self-report questionnaire assessing claustrophobia, doctor–patient communication quality, and doctor–patient trust, together with demographic and examination-related characteristics. Results Claustrophobia was significantly and negatively correlated with both doctor–patient communication quality and doctor–patient trust. Bootstrap analysis indicated a statistically significant cross-sectional indirect effect via doctor-patient communication quality (unstandardized effect = -0.095, 95% CI [-0.170, -0.028]); this indirect effect corresponded to 29.91% of the total effect, a descriptive proportion that does not itself imply causal mediation. Latent profile analysis identified two subgroups—a low-claustrophobia profile and a high-claustrophobia profile—with average posterior classification probabilities of 0.99 for both profiles. The two profiles did not differ significantly in doctor–patient communication quality, whereas a significant difference emerged in doctor–patient trust, with patients in the high-claustrophobia profile reporting significantly lower trust than those in the low-claustrophobia profile. Conclusions These findings suggest that radiology departments should prioritize the early screening and stratified management of claustrophobia, and should employ clear, supportive, and patient-centered communication strategies to enhance patients’ sense of safety, perceived control, and trust, thereby improving the imaging examination experience and facilitating successful examination completion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: