Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Simple anthropometry may complement nutritional assessment in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We examined the associations of arm anthropometry and handgrip strength (HGS) with bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) parameters. Methods: This cross-sectional baseline analysis included 55 adults with IBS-D or IBS-M for valid non-adiposity measurements; 54 contributed valid paired body-fat estimates, and 54 had valid dominant-hand HGS. Results: MUAMC correlated with BIA-derived skeletal muscle mass within men (Spearman’s ρ = 0.748) and women (ρ = 0.673). After adjustment for sex, age, height and body weight, the MUAMC association was attenuated (β = 0.0337 kg/mm, 95% CI 0.0059–0.0616; p = 0.0187). MUAMC was correlated with phase angle in the pooled sample (ρ = 0.806), but sex-related differences were exploratory. In a sensitivity model using the impedance index, the association was not significant after further adjustment for body weight (β = 0.0670, 95% CI −0.0087 to 0.1427; p = 0.0816). HGS correlated with BIA-derived skeletal muscle mass before adjustment (ρ = 0.769; n = 54), whereas an adjusted association was not established. BIA- and skinfold-derived body-fat estimates were correlated but showed proportional bias, limiting interchangeability. Conclusions: MUAMC is associated with BIA-derived muscle-related parameters, but mathematical coupling, body size and the absence of a criterion method limit causal and validation claims. Findings from this exploratory single-centre analysis require independent confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vejmelka et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: