Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We previously demonstrated that Sartobind Rapid A Protein A membrane provides better resolution than traditional resin-based Protein A column. It seems that, in comparison to the Protein A column, Sartobind Rapid A membrane can better differentiate species with different molecular weights. In the current work, we further studied Sartobind Rapid A’s molecular weight-based separation potential by using it to process eight Fc-containing molecules with distinct molecular weights. The data suggested that, except for one molecule, there is a strong correlation between a molecule’s retention time and its molecular weight. In general, larger molecules tend to have longer retention. In relevance to its application in antibody purification, Sartobind Rapid A membrane’s molecular weight-based separation potential can be translated into strong byproduct-removing capabilities. As demonstrated in the present work, under optimized conditions, Sartobind Rapid A membrane effectively removed aggregates and half-antibody, two common byproducts that are remarkably different from the product in molecular weight. Thus, Sartobind Rapid A membrane’s unique separation capability makes it a more attractive tool than resin-based Protein A columns in antibody/Fc-fusion purification, especially for molecules with complex byproduct profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: