Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Microsilica recovered from silicon-production off-gases offers a secondary feedstock for silica-based ceramics. This study evaluates its consolidation by spark plasma sintering (SPS), with purchased commercial nanosilica serving as a reference. Both feedstocks were processed at a monitored die temperature of 1300 °C, 50 MPa, and a 10 min hold. Characterization combined powder microscopy, qualitative X-ray diffraction, hydrostatic weighing, ultrasonic contact impedance (UCI), and axial compression. Mean hydrostatic densities were 2.246 ± 0.007 and 2.254 ± 0.007 g·cm−3 for microsilica and nanosilica, respectively. Mean maximum nominal stresses were 208 ± 13 and 188 ± 6 MPa for Ø14 × 2 mm disks; values are mean ± sample standard deviation (n = 3 per feedstock). The microsilica specimens exhibited a 10.3% higher mean maximum nominal stress under this loading configuration and higher comparative UCI indications. Both cooled ceramics showed reflections consistent with α-cristobalite. The study extends earlier waste-processing work through a comparison with commercial nanosilica that relates powder characteristics and phase identity to replicate property measurements under a common SPS schedule. The results demonstrate the material feasibility of consolidating microsilica waste into coherent ceramic bodies and support further development of this utilization route.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuyskhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: