Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper develops an explicit formal semantics for the interpretive component of the Compounding Parameter (TCP), focusing on endocentric bare-stem nominal compounds. Following earlier TCP-based work, we assume that a single grammatical option, Generalized Modification (GM), underlies creative nominal compounding, adjectival resultatives, and verb-particle constructions. Our main contribution is a new formal semantic entry for GM. We propose that GM in compounding is best understood as taxonomic modification: the head noun denotes a kind-level predicate, and the compound as a whole denotes a subkind of the head kind. Drawing on previous analyses of relational adjectives as modifiers of the kind-level component of a noun’s denotation, we propose that the modifier noun contributes a covert, pragmatically supplied relation, formalized as RELATED, which further specifies this kind-level component. We further suggest that the same conception of GM extends to the event domain, where adjectival resultatives can be modeled as modifiers of event kinds. Although a full semantics of resultatives is beyond the scope of this paper, the analysis shows how nominal and eventive cases can be unified under a common view of GM as taxonomic specification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muramatsu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: