Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We examined temporal changes in the association between wet-bulb globe temperature (WBGT) and heat-related emergency ambulance dispatches (EAD) across Japan’s 47 prefectures during June–September 2015–2023, spanning the COVID-19 pandemic and national Heatstroke Alert implementation. Distributed lag nonlinear models (lag 0–5 days) and two-stage random-effects meta-analysis compared prepandemic (2015–2019), pandemic (2020–2021), and postpandemic (2022–2023) periods. We recorded 577,027 EAD across 51,606 calendar prefecture-days, of which 51,602 had observed WBGT. At the 95th WBGT percentile (31.9 °C), pooled cumulative relative risk (RR) declined from 10.45 (95% CI: 9.69–11.26) to 8.78 (8.17–9.45) and 5.90 (5.44–6.39), respectively: a 43.6% reduction (post/pre-RR ratio: 0.564, 95% CI: 0.506–0.630; P < 0.0001), with the larger step after the pandemic period. Severe-case RRs were higher but also declined (21.38 [17.66–25.88], 16.22 [11.20–23.48], and 12.20 [8.77–16.97]); the period × severity interaction against nonsevere cases was null (Wald χ2 = 3.18, df = 6, P = 0.79). Annualized heat-attributable counts nevertheless increased by 18.1%, versus a 26.1% increase in total EAD, indicating that attenuation offset but did not reverse growth in absolute burden. Latitude modified associations in the first two periods (both P < 0.001) but not postpandemically (P = 0.113), when the proportion aged ≥65 years was the strongest (P = 0.0002). Thus, exposure–response associations attenuated across severity levels while absolute burden increased; exploratory meta-regressions suggested possible changes in geographic patterning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: