Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This cross-sectional study examined the correspondence between objective and self-rated sports nutrition knowledge and its associations with information practices and supplement use. Seven hundred adult gym users residing in Croatia completed an online survey including a study-specific 14-item knowledge index. The median score was 11 of 14 (interquartile range, 9–12). Internal consistency was moderate (KR-20 = 0.703), but scalability was limited (Loevinger’s H = 0.231). Self-rated knowledge was weakly correlated with the score (Spearman’s ρ = 0.129; p < 0.001), and adjusted scores were similar between respondents reporting good and partial knowledge. Selecting scientific articles or PubMed as a main information source was associated with a 0.83-point higher score (95% confidence interval, 0.32–1.35). Among 628 current or previous supplement users, sometimes and always reading labels were associated with 1.86- and 2.05-point higher scores than never reading labels. These associations persisted in bounded-outcome and alternative-adjustment analyses. The overall association with four-level supplement-use status in the full sample was inconclusive (p = 0.095), although regular users scored higher than never-users in an individual nominal comparison. Information practices were associated with performance on the sampled questions, whereas self-ratings provided limited information about tested performance. The study-specific index and cross-sectional design limit conclusions about individual competence and causal relationships.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kovač et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: