Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluated cellular responses to extracts of CAD/CAM-milled PMMA, 3D-printed methacrylate-based resin, and conventionally heat-polymerized PMMA after denture cleanser exposure. Specimens (MTT, n = 240; BrdU, n = 36) were assigned to Corega, chlorhexidine, Listerine, or distilled water. Following accelerated cumulative exposure (1825 min; not simulating clinical use), extracts were applied to human gingival fibroblasts. Cellular metabolic activity was assessed by MTT absorbance, DNA synthesis-associated proliferative activity by quantitative BrdU immunofluorescence, and morphology and F-actin organization qualitatively. Material and cleansing solution significantly affected MTT absorbance (both p < 0.001), with a significant interaction (p = 0.008). CAD/CAM-milled and 3D-printed materials exhibited higher MTT absorbance than conventional PMMA (p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively), without a significant difference between them (p = 0.071). Distilled water yielded higher MTT absorbance than all cleansers (all p < 0.001). BrdU labeling showed a significant cleansing solution effect (p < 0.001) but no significant material effect or interaction. In this preliminary screening study, cleansing solution affected both metabolic and DNA synthesis-associated responses, whereas material differences were significant only for MTT absorbance. Mechanisms were not investigated; the milled material (TEMPO-CAD) is not primarily a denture base material, so findings should not be generalized.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Büyükokuroğlu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: