Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Biologic therapy has transformed psoriasis into a clinically controllable disease, yet skin clearance does not guarantee resolution of the systemic inflammation and vascular dysfunction that drive cardiovascular risk in this population. We hypothesize that interleukin (IL)-23-axis-proximal cytokines and C-reactive protein (CRP) mark two distinct, dissociable inflammatory compartments in psoriasis: IL23-axis-proximal signaling predominantly governs cutaneous disease activity and microvascular endothelial function, whereas CRP integrates a broader cardiometabolic burden and tracks macrovascular recovery. We distinguish IL23-axis-proximal cytokines (IL23, IL17a, IL22), whose production is largely confined to lesional skin, from shared effector cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL1, and IL6), which also arise from adipose tissue and other systemic sources. This model generates two falsifiable predictions: (1) IL23 blockade will improve cutaneous microvascular endothelial function in proportion to suppression of IL23-axis-proximal signaling and out of proportion to any change in CRP, and (2) persistent CRP elevation despite adequate skin clearance will identify patients with blunted macrovascular recovery even when IL23-axis-proximal signaling is suppressed. Because IL6 is a node shared by cutaneous and adipose inflammation, the two compartments are coupled, and we therefore state the model in relative rather than absolute terms: quantitative dissociation, not statistical independence. If confirmed, this compartmentalized model would explain why near-complete skin clearance under biologic therapy, including IL23 blockade, does not uniformly normalize cardiovascular risk, and would offer two complementary, mechanism-specific biomarkers, rather than skin clearance alone, for monitoring vascular recovery after psoriasis treatment. We outline the rationale for this hypothesis and a longitudinal biomarker-imaging design capable of refuting it.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yanbing Zhou (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: