Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Daytime radiative cooling can reduce photovoltaic (PV) operating temperatures but may intensify nocturnal overcooling, dew formation, and dust adhesion. This study experimentally evaluated a transparent polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) radiative-cooling film integrated with an adaptive low-emissivity shutter under hot-arid outdoor conditions in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Eight 100-W monocrystalline PERC modules were investigated using a replicated 2 × 2 factorial design comprising bare (PV-B), film-only (PV-RC), shutter-only (PV-AS), and integrated (PV-AD) configurations. The PDMS film exhibited a solar-weighted transmittance of 0.914 and an atmospheric-window emissivity of 0.918, with a 2.09% optical power penalty. Film presence reduced the adjusted peak-period front-glass temperature by 4.24 °C, although the associated cooling gain did not fully offset optical attenuation under clean conditions. The optimized shutter configuration employed a 30-mm gap, a 1.55 °C activation threshold, and a 1.08 °C hysteresis width. Adaptive shielding reduced PV-surface Dew Exposure Index by 74.9%, wetness duration by 75.7%, and dew mass by 83.8%, primarily relocating condensation to the externally drained shutter surface. Shutter actuation required 0.40 Wh night −1 , with controller and sensor consumption accounted for separately. Despite a 0.33% clean-condition net-energy deficit, PV-AD achieved a day-45 soiling ratio of 0.955 compared with 0.896 for PV-B. Over the 45-day natural-soiling period, cumulative net energy increased from 21.00 to 21.59 kWh, representing a 2.81% improvement. These findings demonstrate that combining daytime radiative cooling with adaptive nighttime shielding can mitigate dew-assisted soiling and improve multi-week PV energy yield under the tested environmental conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mohammed A. Alghassab (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: