Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Producing high-density rice straw bales requires a model that captures the anisotropic deformation and breakage of fresh straw during compression. We therefore developed and calibrated a spherocylinder-based discrete element model for rice straw baling. The model represents hollow elliptical cross-sections, distinct stem and node structures, and anisotropic bonding, and its mechanical and breakage responses were evaluated before its application to compression baling device optimization. Calibration via single-factor, Plackett–Burman, steepest ascent, and Box–Behnken experiments using the angle of repose as the target identifies three key parameters: straw–straw rolling friction (0.593), straw–steel rolling friction (0.188), and node Poisson’s ratio (0.411). The calibrated model reproduced the measured angle of repose with a relative difference of 0.39% and reproduced the compression and shear responses within 10% error. Compared with a multi-sphere model, the spherocylinder model reduces the particle count by 90.25%, simulation time by 72.52%, and memory usage by 89.83%. Adams–EDEM co-simulation reproduced the progressive deformation and localized breakage observed during baling, without excessive pulverization. Simulations across different tapered opening angles identified a balanced density–torque configuration, which was validated by field trials with a relative density error of 1.23%. These results demonstrate the model’s accuracy, efficiency, and practicality for simulating rice straw in compression molding machinery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: