Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Food insecurity may influence nutritional status through pathways that are not fully captured by short-term energy intake, and associations may differ between underweight and excess weight. This cross-sectional study examined 99 Biology students at Universitas Negeri Makassar. Food insecurity was assessed using an adapted 10-item U.S. Adult Food Security Survey Module, dietary intake using one 24-hour food recall, and nutritional status using measured body mass index. Spearman correlation, Kruskal-Wallis tests, direction-specific logistic regression, and multinomial logistic regression as a sensitivity analysis were performed. Overall, 55.6% of students were food insecure, 81.8% had energy intake below 100% of the recommended allowance on the recall day, and 33.3% were underweight. Food insecurity score was not significantly correlated with energy intake, energy adequacy, or BMI. In the binary model comparing underweight with normal BMI, each one-point increase in food insecurity score was associated with 23% higher odds of underweight after adjustment for energy adequacy and sex (aOR=1.23; 95% CI 1.01-1.50; p=0.036). The multinomial estimate for underweight versus normal was similar but borderline significant (RRR=1.19; 95% CI 1.00-1.43; p=0.056). These direction-specific findings should be interpreted as exploratory and warrant confirmation in larger and more diverse samples.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taiyeb et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: