Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Generative Artificial Intelligence has transformed from a back-office production aid to a front-facing creative force in advertising, capable of producing entire campaigns virtual brand ambassadors, synthetic voiceovers, and AI-written copy with little or no human authorship. This paper explores the impact of such synthetic and generative media on brand credibility, perceived authenticity, and audience engagement compared with human-produced advertising assets, through the lens of brand authenticity theory, source-credibility theory, and the machine-heuristic framework. Recent empirical evidence on virtual influencers, AI-generated visuals, synthetic voice, and AI copywriting are synthesised, and a controlled A/B testing methodology is proposed to compare consumer engagement, perceived authenticity, and conversion rates across AI-generated and human-produced ad variants in the fashion and FMCG sectors. The paper concludes that generative AI can match or exceed human-made advertising on efficiency and even short-term engagement metrics, but sustained brand credibility depends on careful creative curation and continued human oversight.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
NAMIT RATRA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: