Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evidence on sex- and age-specific associations between lead levels and childhood growth remains limited. We analyzed 10,324 children aged 12–59 months from the Bangladesh Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey 2025 using survey-weighted multivariable linear regression to examine sex- and age-specific associations of blood lead level (BLL) with anthropometric measures and haemoglobin levels. The geometric mean BLL was 4.43 µg/dL, and 66.3% of children had concentrations above the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) threshold (≥3.5 µg/dL). Higher BLL was associated with lower height-for-age z-score (HAZ) (β = −0.129, 95% CI: −0.182 to −0.076), weight-for-age z-score (WAZ) (β = −0.108, 95% CI: −0.156 to −0.060), and weight-for-height z-score (WHZ) (β = −0.052, 95% CI: −0.101 to −0.002). Higher BLL was also associated with lower HAZ and WAZ among boys (HAZ: β = −0.114, 95% CI: −0.188 to −0.040; WAZ: β = −0.113, 95% CI: −0.179 to −0.046) and girls (HAZ: β = −0.150, 95% CI: −0.225 to −0.075; WAZ: β = −0.104, 95% CI: −0.171 to −0.036), while higher BLL was associated with lower WHZ among boys (β = −0.076, 95% CI: −0.144 to −0.007). Higher BLL was associated with lower HAZ (β = −0.266, 95% CI: −0.408 to −0.125) and WAZ (β = −0.206, 95% CI: −0.326 to −0.086) among boys aged 24–35 months, while among girls aged 36–59 months, corresponding estimates were −0.211 (95% CI: −0.310 to −0.113) and −0.106 (95% CI: −0.191 to −0.022). The findings suggest that longitudinal studies are needed to clarify the temporal and developmental patterns underlying these associations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patwary et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: