Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study evaluates oscillating fiber laser welding as an alternative to gas metal arc welding with an active shielding gas (GMAW/MAG) for manufacturing 4.25 mm thick SAE 1010 agricultural wheel rims. A systematic product development approach guided technology selection. The comparison included process energy, weld geometry, microstructure, grain size, Vickers microhardness, guided-bend testing, and industrial forming. Estimated GMAW/MAG heat input was 0.64 kJ/mm, whereas nominal incident laser energy was 0.019 kJ/mm; these quantities do not represent equivalent measurements of absorbed heat. Measurements from one transverse cross-section per welding condition showed a smaller weld-face width (5.70 vs. 12.97 mm), lower convexity (0.56 versus 3.93 mm), and a narrower heat-affected zone (0.85 versus 2.10 mm) for laser welding compared with GMAW/MAG. Less grain coarsening was observed in the laser-welded heat-affected zone. Mean fusion-zone hardness was 158.6 ± 18.9 HV1 for laser welding and 190.4 ± 11.0 HV1 for GMAW/MAG. Both conditions passed the guided-bend tests. All ten laser-welded specimens completed industrial forming, whereas two of ten GMAW/MAG specimens fractured during cone opening. The examined laser-welded cross-section exhibited a narrower weld profile than the examined GMAW/MAG cross-section. The laser-welding manufacturing route also eliminated the post-weld grinding operation under the investigated conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Queiroz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: