Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The high water content, low strength and high compressibility of waste silt limit its direct reuse as road subgrade fill. This study evaluated a cement-based geopolymer comprising cement, ground granulated blast-furnace slag, fly ash and NaOH for stabilizing waste silt. Its engineering performance was assessed through strength, bearing, water stability, consolidation, direct-shear and permeability tests, using cement and geopolymer treatments as references. The 7 day unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of the composite reached 1428 kPa. Its soaked California bearing ratio (CBR) was 215.7% after 7 days of curing followed by 96 h of immersion, the highest among the tested groups. Composite specimens remained intact after early-age immersion, whereas reference specimens fractured or disintegrated. At 14 day, the immersed UCS reached 2155.1 kPa with 97.2% strength retention, and the coefficient of compressibility was 0.0400 MPa−1. The cohesion and internal friction angle exceeded those of the 15% cement and geopolymer treatments. Permeability was lowest among stabilized groups but remained higher than that of untreated silt. These findings support the potential use of cement-based geopolymer for improving the engineering suitability of naturally wet silt as road subgrade fill.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: