Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The fate of urea-derived carbon (urea-C) in paddy soils is poorly understood. Although urea-C is generally considered to be rapidly mineralized and released as CO2, a fraction may be retained in soil through physicochemical and microbial processes. Here, we used 13C-labeled urea combined with 13C-phospholipid fatty acid stable isotope probing (13C-PLFA-SIP) to determine the fate of urea-C under contrasting long-term irrigation and straw management practices and to identify the microbial groups involved in its assimilation. Soil CO2 efflux peaked on day 5, whereas the proportion of urea-derived CO2 in total soil CO2 efflux generally peaked on day 3. Both subsequently declined during the observation period. Cumulative urea-C loss as CO2 accounted for 36–60% of the applied C, with straw return stimulating early CO2 release and the greatest loss occurring under controlled irrigation combined with straw return. Nevertheless, a measurable fraction of urea-C remained in the soil, declining to approximately 10% of the applied C by day 21, with greater retention under flooded irrigation. Controlled irrigation combined with straw return increased microbial biomass and the fungal-to-bacterial (F/B) and Gram-positive-to-Gram-negative (GP/GN) ratios. 13C-PLFA-SIP further revealed distinct microbial partitioning of urea-C: flooded irrigation promoted incorporation into general and Gram-positive bacteria, whereas controlled irrigation favored Actinomycetes and fungi. Straw return increased urea-C incorporation into Actinomycetes and decreased its incorporation into Gram-positive bacteria under both irrigation regimes, while enhancing incorporation into Gram-negative bacteria only under controlled irrigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tian et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: