Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sectoral exergy studies of transport usually end with a single projected path and no stated uncertainty. In the current study, we develop a calibrated framework to address this and apply it to the Nigerian transport sector. First, we show that exergy-based indicators reduce to one parameter, the subsector exergy efficiency, so that they agree by construction. Next, we forecast fuel demand with an equal weight combination of a Gaussian process trend model and a drift model. Rolling origin backtests show that drift remains the best point forecaster, while the combination gives the best interval score. One scale factor calibrates the 90% intervals to 90.3% coverage, 88.3% on held-out origins, with no widening needed at long horizons. Independent national statistics for 2020 to 2023, never used in fitting, fall inside the 90% intervals in all four years. After updating with these data, Monte Carlo propagation gives 81 Mt of CO2 in 2040 (90% interval 34 to 123 Mt) and an improvement potential of 695 PJ (294 to 1028 PJ). This potential is a thermodynamic upper bound, not an achievable saving. Demand drives almost all CO2 uncertainty. Correlated demand, interactions and changing efficiencies alter them only modestly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simeon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: