Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this research, two new Cu(II) complexes, namely a dinuclear complex, [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2 [Cu 2 L(piv)] 2 Cl 4 ·H 2 O ( 1 ), and a trinuclear complex, [Cu 3 L(prop)(Cl) 2 ]·3H 2 O ( 2 ), were investigated. Their structural aspects, thermal behaviors and magnetic properties were explored, featuring a flexible multidentate organic ligand H 3 L (H 3 L = N , N′ ‐bis(2‐carboxybenzyl)‐ N , N′ ‐bis(2‐pyridylmethyl)‐1,3‐diaminopropan‐2‐ol), alongside the carboxylate coligands pivalate (piv = C(CH 3 ) 3 CO 2 − ) and propionate (prop = CH 3 CH 2 CO 2 − ). In the solid state structure of 1 , within the [Cu 2 ] complex, the Cu(II) ions are doubly‐bridged by one alkoxide group of L 3− ligand and one pivalate group, with nonbonded internuclear Cu···Cu separation of 3.467(2) Å. In contrast, the trinuclear [Cu 3 ] complex ( 2 ) exhibits three nonbonded internuclear Cu···Cu separations, with the values of 3.488(1), 3.362(1) and 3.349(1) Å. Thus, the structural design of 2 shows a triangular topology formed via the coordination arrangement of three Cu centers located at the corners of a nearly isosceles triangle. Thermogravimetric analysis showed that 1 and 2 are stable up to around 203 and 217 °C, respectively. Magnetic properties showed the presence of antiferromagnetic interactions with coupling constant ( J ) values of −310(1) cm −1 in 1 , and −47.1(1) and −55.3(1) cm −1 in 2 . The nature and mechanism of magnetic interactions have been delineated on account of magneto‐structural correlations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sarkar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: