Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dextromethorphan is extensively O-demethylated by cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) to dextrorphan, and the two molecules do not share a target profile. Dextrorphan is the more potent N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel blocker; the parent compound is the more potent serotonin transporter inhibitor; their sigma-1 affinities are comparable, so differences in sigma-1 engagement depend on exposure rather than intrinsic affinity. CYP2D6 activity therefore does not scale exposure to a fixed pharmacology; it determines which pharmacology is expressed. This review develops that principle and extends it to a three-agent system. From published unbound concentrations and functional potencies, we calculate a model-derived fractional-target-engagement index. Under the base-case inputs, CYP2D6 inhibition raises the serotonergic index approximately fourfold while reducing the NMDA channel index; deterministic sensitivity analysis shows that the direction is robust to one-at-a-time 0.5-fold to 2-fold perturbations but not to all joint extreme assumptions. Quinidine and bupropion are analyzed as mechanistically distinct proofs of concept, and quinidine-derived exposure estimates are not treated as quantitative surrogates for the dextromethorphan–bupropion steady state. The framework is then applied to the untested question of whether a boosted dextromethorphan combination and esketamine are redundant or complementary. The agents share an NMDA channel mechanism, while CYP2B6 pathway overlap remains a hypothesis-generating observation rather than evidence of clinically relevant competition. No controlled data on the three-agent combination exist, and no therapeutic recommendation is made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fagiolini et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: